I was listening to a podcast
today about LDS issues and this statement struck me:
“We on the whole, Mormons, don’t do theology really. We don’t have theologians. We have historians. That’s where our issues are fought out.”1
That is a fascinating statement to me.
History can be a dangerous and complicated place for a religion to fight a battle. It is a particularly vulnerable place for a religion as new
as ours is. It is our insistence on (quite recent) actual
events, actual visions, and actual miracles that makes our religion
peculiar, often laughable to other peoples. But fighting the battle of historical miracles gives power to our claims.
For example, our church teaches that the
cornerstone of our religion is the Book of Mormon. The Book of Mormon is a book
of scripture translated from golden plates—plates that we claim were actually hefted out of a hillside and
given to a boy prophet by an angel, and then handled and looked at by a dozen plus
witnesses. Each witness swore their name to a document, claiming that
they saw with their eyes and “handled with their hands”2 and turned
the pages of very literal plates of gold. These were gold plates that were plausible
enough that local enemies of the prophet certainly believed in them; at least they went
through great lengths to try and steal them from the prophet. These were gold plates
that were hidden in a tree stump, in a barrel of grain, under a bed, up in a
barn. This is all a matter of historical record. One can dispute the record if
they wish. It could, after all, be an elaborate hoax involving dozens of people.
But we latter-day saints, much to the consternation of some critics, believe in
the historicity of actual gold plates.
Not to mention the history found on the
plates themselves—not just a straightforward little story, but one that is
extremely complex, far beyond the education level of our little 24 year old hayseed
prophet—one that includes at least three groups of people that all lived in the
Americas during a thousand year plus historical time-frame, making for a
wonderfully complicated story. Besides the depth of doctrine and incredible clarity of teaching, we also have accounts of ancient government systems, compelling
family dynamics, ancient warfare tactics, a system of coinage, political treatises,
and much more. There is no shortage of historical claims found there that can
be examined, disputed, and engaged with, and while it contains the “fullness of
the gospel of Christ,” it is clear that The Book of Mormon is not a mere theological
treatise. It is a historical record preserved with incredible detail and force,
with remarkable spiritual weight heavier than the gold it was written on, and
it is meant to convince us all, “Jew and Gentile, that Jesus is the Christ.” It
is extraordinarily compelling evidence to
me at least. Those that treat it lightly, reject it, or ignore it; I
believe they do so at their own spiritual peril.
Latter-day saints also believe in a historical God, one
that came down to Joseph Smith with an actual body in the Spring of 1820—that He
had hands, eyes, ears, hair, toenails, and all the rest—and didn’t just poof
around like a magical mystery force in the universe, but actually pointed to His
Son with a real finger, calling a teenage farmboy by his name to answer his prayer.
Imagine! For us it is a remarkably real and historical event.
Then, as if that weren’t enough, we also
believe that real, tangible, actual angels came down from heaven and put their
actual hands on Joseph Smith’s head to restore the priesthood. The Latter-day
Saint claim to authority is not a mere abstraction. It was a historical event
in the same way that Moses spoke to God in the burning bush, that Israelites actually
walked through the Red Sea on dry ground, and that Christ was actually
resurrected and appeared to his disciples. The story of the restoration by the
prophet Joseph Smith is so simple that my young children can tell the story.
That is powerful stuff to me.
Did God really appear to Joseph Smith in
New York? Did he see an angel named Moroni in his bedroom? Did the eleven witnesses
really see and handle plates? These are the questions that rise from the
history claims, not theology.
“Sure,” a person may say, “But there is
no real proof.”
Well, this is history, not mathematics. No
one can prove history, but what we
can do is look at the evidence to more accurately inform our understanding. While our faith issues are fought out in history, historical proof is not the basis
of our faith. Proof is not how God works. We have a God who took back the gold
plates, because He expects us to live by faith. This is frustrating to
some, but learning faith is precisely why we came to earth. We already had proof when we
lived in heaven.
As James says, faith is the "evidence of things not seen." And the evidence we do have is quite good. At least, it is to me. And the Book of Mormon is at the heart of it. As someone who has read the book dozens of times, I have learned it is evidence I can throw the weight of my most troubling questions against, and it holds firm. It delivers on its promise to convince the world that Jesus is the Christ with miraculous power. While its context is historical, its purpose is always spiritual.
In the historical restoration narrative, yes, there
are certain questions that are raised. Everyone should grapple with
those questions in some way. Questions and doubts are a necessary catalyst for exercising
faith. The history is
complicated enough, perhaps by design, to demand a humble prayer, a wrestle of some sort for all seekers of truth, rather than be led gently down the road of easy, passive belief. We can put away our yearning for simplistic answers and then dive into the questions without fear.
There is ambiguity enough to muck around in our historical records and discover the complexity of God there. Certainty is not often something that God generally offers. But He doesn't make things harder than they have to be, either. He gives us needed evidence of His everlasting love, of His commitment to ancient promises, and His intimate involvement in the lives of His children, like answering a fourteen year old boy's prayer in a forest, and sending angels and buried books and all the rest.
So
we are back at the basics. If our issues are historical, not theological, then
we must study the historical evidence to formulate our spiritual questions, most
crucially by studying the Book of Mormon, and we do so with sincerity, humility and faith,3
and then we ask God.
__________________________________
1. Daniel Peterson in “Tough Questions
about Mormon Polygamy.” Retrieved from http://www.ldsperspectives.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/37LDSP-Tough-Questions-about-Mormon-Polygamy.pdf
2. The Testimony of Eight Witnesses.
3. Moroni 10:3-5
No comments:
Post a Comment